FC4 slimfast slimfest
Joshua Eichorn
josh at bluga.net
Tue Feb 22 18:59:53 UTC 2005
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>On Feb 22, 2005, Elliot Lee <sopwith at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Tim Daly wrote:
>>
>>
>>>An alternative approach is to adopt the Knoppix compressed file system.
>>>Knoppix manages to get about 2.3Gig on a single CD.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>The .rpm packages are already compressed, so a compressed file system
>>won't help here. Thanks for thinking outside the box, though!
>>
>>
>
>Talking of compressing stuff... Couldn't we perhaps compress the
>hdlist and hdlist2 files in Fedora/base? Could we perhaps merge the
>contents of hdstg2.img and netstg2.img that, given their similar size,
>might be assumed to contain mostly the same contents? And how about
>stage2.img, if that's a superset? This certainly wouldn't get us the
>300MB we need, but it could get us 5-15% of that.
>
>
>
You could also save similar amounts by only shipping either the
postscript or pdf version of docs and not both. (more if you ship 1 of
html,ps,pdf)
There really are some easy to get size savings around that don't entail
dropping packages.
-josh
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list