Goal: Increased Modularity?
Thomas Fitzsimmons
fitzsim at redhat.com
Fri Sep 7 20:46:21 UTC 2007
Richi Plana wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 21:29 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007 à 12:33 -0500, Les Mikesell a écrit :
>>> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I want to know the correct JAVA_HOME and PATH settings for all the
>>>>>> possible JVMs when they are installed as alternatives-conforming RPM
>>>>>> packages but are not the system default. Is this documented somewhere?
>>> So, where do I find the answer to the question above regarding the
>>> correct JAVA_HOME and PATH to use a JVM that is not the system default?
>> If the question is "what is the list of the roots of all the possible
>> VMs that may be released for Linux and packaged using jpp conventions"
>
> Well, one method (and this isn't official AFAIK) is to run "alternatives
> --config java" or "alternatives --config javac" and that should give you
> a starting point for figuring out the list of JAVA_HOME paths for
> packages installed that are blessed by JPackage (or was it Fedora? since
> I'm not sure where alternatives support was introduced).
Another method of querying and selecting blessed JPackage alternatives is
system-switch-java. It simplifies selection because it switches all relevant
master links (java, javac, plugin) to the selected vendor/version
implementations. Try:
yum install system-switch-java
Tom
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list