[389-users] Is there Linked Attributes configuration and usage documentation available?

[Sean Brady]

Nathan, that was exactly what I needed- works like a charm!

I hereby declare you awesome!  Thanks again!

SB

From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinder
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:20 AM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Is there Linked Attributes configuration and usage documentation available?

On 12/02/2009 05:47 AM, Sean Brady wrote:
OK, I see some helpful errors in the logs here:

linkedattrs-plugin - linked_attrs_parse_config_entry: The linkType config setting is required for linked attribute pair "cn=manager link,cn=linked attributes,cn=plugins,cn=config".

[02/Dec/2009:06:19:24 -0700] linkedattrs-plugin - linked_attrs_parse_config_entry: Invalid config entry [cn=manager link,cn=linked attributes,cn=plugins,cn=config] skipped

So... I am assuming that there is a configuration entry that I need called "linkType", which isn't listed in the link per se, although there is a reference to it in passing.  Can someone help me with the expected type of value, ie is this an attribute type, etc?  What do I need here?
The feature design page you referenced had the configuration attributes named incorrectly (the attribute names changed between the design and implementation of the feature).  I have updated the configuration section of that page to be correct.  Please look here for details:

http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Linked_Attributes_Design#Configuration

In short, you need to use "linkType" and "managedType" instead of "linkAttribute" and "managedAttribute" in your config entry that you have referenced below.

-NGK


The following was added to my dse.ldif:

dn: cn=Manager Link, cn=Linked Attributes,cn=plugins,cn=config
objectClass: extensibleObject
objectClass: top
cn: Manager Link
linkattribute: directReport
managedattribute: linkmanager

Both the linkattribute "directReport" and managedattribute "linkmanager" are custom attributes added as "MAY" to a custom "employee" objectclass, to which 3 test users have as an attribute value.  I didn't want to conflict with any existing attributes, and I noticed that the directreport attribute did not exist.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
SB

From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com<mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Sean Brady
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:05 PM
To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com<mailto:fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
Subject: [389-users] Is there Linked Attributes configuration and usage documentation available?

Hello All,

I have 389 up and running, and had some questions on Linked Attributes.  I found this http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Linked_Attributes_Design but that is the extent of the documentation that I have found.  Does anyone know of any additional documentation that you can point me to?

I am unclear on exactly how to configure Linked Attributes properly, and how to use them.  Specifically, which ldif file would I need to modify to create a linked attribute?  Would that be dse.ldif, or one of the ldif's in the schema sub-folder (/etc/dirsrv/slapd-<instance_name>/schema)?  What else would I need to know to configure a linked attribute?  What do I need to know about it's usage?

Once I have the details I can post some documentation back to the community- there is nothing in the RedHat Directory Server on this plugin as of yet that I have seen.  I don't think that this can be done through the GUI at this time...

Thanks in advance for the community's help.

SB








--

389 users mailing list

389-users at redhat.com<mailto:389-users at redhat.com>

https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20091202/a26838f2/attachment.htm>