Bugzilla Entries

[Toshio]

On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 11:22 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:03:52 -0500, Toshio wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I started making up a list of packages in the CVS repository that didn't
> > have any Bugzilla Components in the hopes that we could get that synced
> > up::
> >   http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fPackagesLackingBugzilla
> > 
> > But I noticed that some things in the rpms directory of the cvs tree are
> > a bit strange such as autoconf and bitstream-vera-fonts.  So I havesome
> > questions:
> > 
> > * Is this a useful list?
> 
> Yes and no. ;)
>
> You've caught too many false positives. All modules in "devel" tree, which
> are empty or not active anymore, don't need a bugzilla component.  Same
> for FC-3. There is no point in creating components for older packages
> previously hosted at fedora.us.
> 
  http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fPackagesLackingBugzilla
Has been updated to sync against the devel hierarchy of the cvs server.
It's significantly shorter now :-)  Does it make sense to have everyone
take a look and request Bugzilla updates if their packages are listed
there?

-Toshio

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050319/9a693d91/attachment.sig>