1-2-3 out, time for FC2?
Tres Seaver
tseaver at palladion.com
Wed Apr 5 23:33:42 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:07, NARS wrote:
>
>>If fedoralegacy supported FC1 for so long why to take fc2 out now? Try to
>>do a search on dedicated servers providers, you will find most of them
>>still provide FC2, and for eg. Plesk supports FC3 only on latest versions
>>(officially)... another example, look at this poll at ART's site:
>>http://www.atomicrocketturtle.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=NS-Polls&file
>>=index&req=results&pollID=6&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
>>
>>I think FC2 is still used by many people, I would suggest you consider
>>supporting FC2 for some more time if possible.
>
>
> Honestly, I feel that supporting FC1 for so long was a mistake. It set a
> precedence that I really don't want to continue. Legacy picked a timeline
> that fit well with what Fedora produces, and what RHEL (and rebuilds) offer.
> Going further than that is really beyond the scope of the Fedora Project as a
> whole. Falling back into our 1-2-3 and out set schedule will be the best
> thing, and to get to that point we need to drop FC1 and FC2, to make room for
> FC3. We need to concentrate on doing better for the releases we do support,
> and adding to the workload is not the way to do this. Fedora is great, and
> the lifespan we can give it is a good, but if you need more, you should
> probably be looking at RHEL or one of its rebuilds.
I don't know that you had any alternative: AFAICT, the active
maintainers *all* care about older releases (RH73., RH9, FC1); I
haven't seen a package QA'ed for FC2 before those since it rolled to Legacy.
Dropping the releases which get actual love may feel cleaner, but I
don't think you are going to get the folks who have been maintaining
those older releases to switch to a newer FC: they will, as you point
out, more likely switch away from Fedora altogether. Perhaps there are
a group of volunteers who care about more recent FC releases, and who
can take up the load.
Best,
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFENFPW+gerLs4ltQ4RAppSAJ4rPLER4mHRLDDLWnmqgzEIIjIwaACgocF0
TeOzPYSiUUuW/EqmRkSk4zs=
=hLgg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list