FC4 does not work, 'out of the box' for me; GUI/X11 fails
Andy Green
andy at warmcat.com
Thu Oct 27 21:21:34 UTC 2005
Les Mikesell wrote:
>>Here's a wild thought, maybe the whole idea of ISO images, sampling a
>>copy of the rest of the repo state base-only or with updates, is
>>actually the evil part here.
> Partly right.
I see :-)
> It's obviously horribly wasteful and not particularly
> useful to have a gazillion mirror copies of the giant every-changing
> workspace of fedora archived away. However, isos make good bittorrent
> and rsync targets and as such make sense for bandwidth sharing and
> saving.
Bittorrent and rsync works fine with directories of files.
> Maintaining local yum repos means you have to mirror a lot of gunk
> you'll never use and relying on remote ones means trouble when
> things get out of sync. What we need is a more intelligent way
> to share bandwidth without cluttering the world with useless
> snapshots.
A cacheing proxy might be interesting to solve this objection, rather
than an explicit mirror. Then nothing is pulled down that is not a
selected package for at least one proxy user.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051027/4cd5aa1f/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list