Fedora Developer Ranking System v1

[Warren Togami]

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I disagree. The problem afaics (correct me if I'm wrong) is only solved 
> if the packager is a sponsor. But we should solve the problem also for 
> non-sponsors, so a normal and experienced packager (I'd roughly say this 
> means all of the packagers we currently have that are around for more 
> then 3 months and have at least two packages) that are not yet sponsors 
> should be able to get upstream involved easily, too.
> 
> In other words: FD0 should gets access to some packages only, no access 
> to the buildsystem to prevent that stuff get build and pushed out. 
> Members of FD2 (e.g. packagers that are around for some time and got a 
> bit experience) could approve members for FD0 (for example upstream or 
> new packagers) and give them access to their packages. But FD2 members 
> should still not be able to upgrade people to FD1 (that should still 
> require a proper sponsor).
> 
> CU
> thl
> 

Interesting, I had not considered the possibility that members lower 
than sponsor (FD5) could bring FD0 onboard.  This might work.

Warren