keeping spare-time-contributors happy

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hans de Goede wrote:
> Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram pisze:
>>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> And why not ? They worked well enough before, didn't they?
>>>>
>>>> Don't get me wrong I'm in favor of updates announcements and of
>>>> avoiding unneeded updates.
>>> If you already in favor of these, I don't think you need any convincing
>>> that these are important for the end users. Sure, they aren't absolutely
>>> necessary but these are an improvement over what we had previously and
>>> there is some additional overhead as part of that.
>>>
>>> If anyone in favor of the processes then implementation details can be
>>> improved. If anyone thinks that the processes themselves are not useful
>>> then any implementation won't make them happy. Don't mix these.
>>>
>>> Rahul
>> The other problem is that pup does not display the info maintainers put
>> into bodhi yet.
>>
> 
> So you mean that we are doing this whole dance for like .. nothing?
> Ah great planning guys.

The update announcement are part of the emails send out to fedora-test 
as well as fedora-package-announce list. IIRC pup used to display these 
for a brief period before being disable due to bugs.

Rahul