[Fedora-packaging] The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 18:50:59 UTC 2008

Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:15 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>>> It still feels like a bit of an abuse of libexec.
>>>> I prefer using %{_libdir}/%{name}(-%{version})/bin for this purpose.
>>> Agreed.  As had been pointed out already, libexec is for private stuff, 
>>> not exposed to the end-user.
>> Agreed also.
> OK, I'll put the binaries to %{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/bin .
Hold on to that point for a few... I think Ed Hill and Ralf Corsepius
have a valid point about %{_libexecdir}/%{name}-%{version}/bin being the
proper place.  I'm going to comment in the other subthread, though, so
we don't get too scattered.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20081008/cbcb03dd/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list