"HASHTAB_OVERFLOW" undeclared

Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com
Fri Mar 30 14:57:20 UTC 2007


Ken YANG wrote:
> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:43 +0800, Ken YANG wrote:
>>> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 10:49 +0800, Ken YANG wrote:
>>>>> i want to use findcon to find a type "tmpfs_t".
>>>>> but in FC, there is setools* package contaning findcon.
>>>>> i find that secmds(findcon) is in setools-console subpackage
>>>>> why fc has not this subpackage?
>>>> That's a question for Dan Walsh (cc'd above) or fedora-selinux-list.
>>> ok, i have cc to fedora-selinux-list
>>>
>>>>> i down a setools-3.1-1.src.rpm from tresys site, and encounter
>>>>> a build error:
>>>>>
>>>>> policy_extend.c: In function 'qpol_policy_build_attrs_from_map':
>>>>> policy_extend.c:170: error: 'HASHTAB_OVERFLOW' undeclared (first 
>>>>> use in this function)
>>>>> policy_extend.c:170: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
>>>>> reported only once
>>>>> policy_extend.c:170: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>>>> policy_extend.c: In function 'qpol_policy_fill_attr_holes':
>>>>> policy_extend.c:246: error: 'HASHTAB_OVERFLOW' undeclared (first 
>>>>> use in this function)
>>>>> make[4]: *** [policy_extend.o] Error 1
>>>>> make[4]: Leaving directory 
>>>>> `/workbench/rpmbuild/BUILD/setools-3.1/libqpol/src'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i have not find "HASHTAB_OVERFLOW" in selinux trunk, especially in
>>>>> libsepol. where is this symbol defined?
>>>> Those error codes were replaced by standard ones
>>>> (include/sepol/errcodes.h) in the trunk version of libsepol, so you
>>>> would need to build setools against the stable branch version of
>>>> libsepol until they update setools.
>>> thank you.
>>>
>>> i play some tricks on the setools :-)
>>>
>>> in the spec file of setools-3.1-3.fc7, i find "findcon" and other cmds
>>> had been removed:
>>>
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/findcon
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/replcon
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/searchcon
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/indexcon
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/searchcon.1
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/indexcon.1
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/replcon.1
>>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/findcon.1
>>> rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_includedir}/libsefs/sqlite
>>>
>>>
>>> so i comment "findcon relative" items, and add corresponding items
>>> in "files" list.
>>>
>>> it seems that this kind of "findcon" works.
>>>
>>> this is a temporary method, i just want to use findcon to search
>>> certain context
>>
>> How does it differ from find . -context ...?
>
> actually, i forgot it also can be done by "find" :-))
> for my purpose,
>
> find certaindir -context "tmpfs_t"
>
> is same with findcon.
>
> but maybe these commands, such as indexcon, will be useful
> for diagnosing problem in another machine, as said by
> Christopher j. PeBenito in selinux list
>
>>
>
>
setools-3_1-4_fc7  will have those tools.




More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list