[Libvirt-cim] libvirt-cim rpm for Fedora 9 versus recent provider repository

[Daniel Veillard]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:59:27AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> GY> The processor id changed to domanin_name/proc, then does the
> GY> libvirt-cim rpm for Fedora 9 will reflect this recent changes? If
> GY> so, when is it time to replace? Also the same issues in terms of
> GY> MB versus KB for memory.  I'm not sure if libvirt-cim rpm freezed,
> GY> then how cimtest are represent?  Do we have to branch cimtest into
> GY> two parts, one for libvirt-cim rpm, the other for recent provider
> GY> changes?
> 
> This is a good point.  The Fedora 9 RPM has been unchanged for a while
> now, so none of the changes that you mention are included.  I think

  Basically the Fedora-9 tree is frozen, but you should be able
to push update for it after it has been released

> that the test development should proceed to track the libvirt-cim
> development tree, but perhaps there is a way that we can map FAIL to

  Well you could push dated release to rawhide but it can get tiring
quickly

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard at redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/