RE: [Linux-cluster] RHEL5 cluster problem...
Kovacs, Corey J.
cjk at techma.com
Wed Sep 13 16:31:02 UTC 2006
James, didn't know that s-c-cluster wasn't updated, good to know, not a
problem as I like the command line anyway :)
I did know about the nodeid so that's good to go.
Thanks for the heads up on s-c-cluster
From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of James Parsons
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:14 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] RHEL5 cluster problem...
Kovacs, Corey J. wrote:
> Good morning..
> Some oddness regarding clusterring on RHEL5beta1 (could be me)
> I have a two node cluster and the cluster components installed.
> I have two nics in each node, the second of which I want to use for
> I have my cluster.conf pointing to the primary nic and I have openais
> pointing to 192.168.0.0 (my second nics are on 192.168.0.1 and 2)
> Things seem to start ok on both nodes but they don't appear to be
> talking to eachother.
> For instance, clustat on the first node shows both nodes active even
> if node2 is down.
> Actually, openais seems to be doing fine, but cman looks to be acting up.
> This config was created using s-c-cluster and indeed it looks good. Am
> I missing some new fundemental thing with the new cluster versions?
> I've been running RHCS/GFS on RHEL3 and RHEL4 for some time now but
> this is my first attempt at the new (openais based) clusterring.
> Any thoughts?
EEk. s-c-cluster is NOT updated completely for rhel5 cluster in the beta
1 release - Sorry, Corey.
Are you aware that each node needs an explicit 'nodeid' attribute value
in the conf file, in addition to the name attribute? This just needs to
be a unique integer value...a simple enumeration of the nodes, 1, 2, 3...
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster at redhat.com
More information about the Linux-cluster