[Linux-cluster] Highly available services
Jeff Sturm
jeff.sturm at eprize.com
Mon Dec 17 16:12:35 UTC 2007
I confess my experience with RHCS is pretty much limited to running GFS.
You make a good point.
Aside from shared coherent storage, what other interesting problems does
RHCS solve?
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Soren Hansen
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:17 AM
To: linux-cluster at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Highly available services
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:09:29AM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> At a quick glance, I'd say fencing doesn't meet your needs, and RH
> Cluster Suite may be overkill. You've worked out the details of
> failover, you just need to automate it.
Well, it's not called RedHat Fencing Suite, is it? :)
> Have you tried heartbeat? It is well suited for simple failover of
> resources such as IP addresses.
Heartbeat has indeed been doing this for me up until now. :) I was just
under the impression that rhcs was supposed to be a superset of
heartbeat.
I've managed to work around it in sneaky, sneaky, ways, but I'd really
like to hear how this is *supposed* to be accomplished if at all.
--
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Server Team
http://www.ubuntu.com/
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list