[Linux-cluster] GFS Tuning - it's just slow, to slow for production
Alan A
alan.zg at gmail.com
Thu Mar 4 15:12:03 UTC 2010
Hello all - GFS2 is what we have deployed. It is fiber channel
connection/HBA to HP XP SAN.
*What workload are you tuning for? The chances are that you'll do a lot
better by adjusting the way in which the application(s) use the
filesystem rather than tweeking any specific tuning parameters. What
mount parameters are you using?*
>From /etc/fstab:
/dev/mapper/vg_acct10-lv_acct10 /acct10 gfs
rw,hostdata=jid=0:id=589826:first=1 0 0
We decided to delay production (no one is using GFS right now) but here are
the stats for GFS mount:
[root at fenclxmrcati11 ~]# gfs_tool counters /acct10
locks 4206
locks held 2046
freeze count 0
incore inodes 2003
metadata buffers 84
unlinked inodes 0
quota IDs 0
incore log buffers 0
log space used 0.10%
meta header cache entries 0
glock dependencies 0
glocks on reclaim list 0
log wraps 3
outstanding LM calls 0
outstanding BIO calls 0
fh2dentry misses 0
glocks reclaimed 154841
glock nq calls 15604058
glock dq calls 15600149
glock prefetch calls 3684
lm_lock calls 155504
lm_unlock calls 113531
lm callbacks 290967
address operations 22796796
dentry operations 1532231
export operations 0
file operations 16918046
inode operations 2190281
super operations 10224698
vm operations 201974
block I/O reads 0
block I/O writes 0
[root at fenclxmrcati11 ~]# gfs_tool stat /acct10
mh_magic = 0x01161970
mh_type = 4
mh_generation = 63
mh_format = 400
mh_incarn = 0
no_formal_ino = 26
no_addr = 26
di_mode = 0775
di_uid = 500
di_gid = 500
di_nlink = 4
di_size = 3864
di_blocks = 1
di_atime = 1267660812
di_mtime = 1265728936
di_ctime = 1266338341
di_major = 0
di_minor = 0
di_rgrp = 0
di_goal_rgrp = 0
di_goal_dblk = 0
di_goal_mblk = 0
di_flags = 0x00000001
di_payload_format = 1200
di_type = 2
di_height = 0
di_incarn = 0
di_pad = 0
di_depth = 0
di_entries = 4
no_formal_ino = 0
no_addr = 0
di_eattr = 0
di_reserved =
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Flags:
jdata
[root at fenclxmrcati11 ~]# gfs_tool gettune /acct10
ilimit1 = 100
ilimit1_tries = 3
ilimit1_min = 1
ilimit2 = 500
ilimit2_tries = 10
ilimit2_min = 3
demote_secs = 300
incore_log_blocks = 1024
jindex_refresh_secs = 60
depend_secs = 60
scand_secs = 5
recoverd_secs = 60
logd_secs = 1
quotad_secs = 5
inoded_secs = 15
glock_purge = 0
quota_simul_sync = 64
quota_warn_period = 10
atime_quantum = 3600
quota_quantum = 60
quota_scale = 1.0000 (1, 1)
quota_enforce = 1
quota_account = 1
new_files_jdata = 0
new_files_directio = 0
max_atomic_write = 4194304
max_readahead = 262144
lockdump_size = 131072
stall_secs = 600
complain_secs = 10
reclaim_limit = 5000
entries_per_readdir = 32
prefetch_secs = 10
statfs_slots = 64
max_mhc = 10000
greedy_default = 100
greedy_quantum = 25
greedy_max = 250
rgrp_try_threshold = 100
statfs_fast = 0
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino at redhat.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:33:28AM -0600, Alan A wrote:
> > We are trying to deploy GFS in production, and are experiencing major
> > performance issues. What parameters in GFS settune can be changed to
> > increase I/O, to better tune performance? Application we run utilizes a
> lot
> > of I/O, please advise.
> >
> > We experience OK performance when starting, but as things ramp up and we
> get
> > few processes going GFS slows dramatically.
> >
> > --
> > Alan A.
>
> > --
> > Linux-cluster mailing list
> > Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Are you using GFS1 or GFS2 ?
>
> If you are using GFS1, try to use GFS2, GFS1 will be deprecated and GFS2
> has a lot of "auto-tuning" parameters as default and the performance is
> better as well.
> So, try to look at this document:
>
>
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Global_File_System_2/s1-manage-atimeconf.html
>
> see ya
>
> --
> ---
>
> Best Regards
>
> Carlos Eduardo Maiolino
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
--
Alan A.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20100304/f93a6605/attachment.htm>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list