[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Austin Macdonald]

It feels like we are approaching a consensus around `pulp3`. I would like
to take an informal poll using the voting syntax from PUP-1. [0] The other
questions need to be hashed out a little more.

+1 pulp3
+0 pulpproject
-0  pulpproj
-0 pulp_platform
-1 plp

[0]: https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#voting

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm not a fan of plp, it does look too much like pip IMO
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacdona at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Another alternative: plp
>>
>> Pros:
>>  - super short!
>>  - pinky typing exercise
>>
>> Cons:
>>  - Fonts are silly: plp (PLP) looks like pIp (PIP)
>>  - sounds "web 2.0"
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
>>> > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the
>>> obvious,
>>> > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our
>>> major
>>> > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate
>>> projects.
>>> > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual.
>>>
>>> You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!"
>>> and
>>> feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170413/fe3447c5/attachment.htm>