[Pulp-dev] PUP Process: "obvious consensus"

Austin Macdonald amacdona at redhat.com
Mon Jun 12 15:35:31 UTC 2017

This reminds me of the concept of a "Do-ocracy".

If developers take the time to research and write up a proposal, they have
"done". It seems completely reasonable to default to the opinion of the
people that cared enough to do the work. If it isn't the right decision,
then someone must actively block it, simple as that.

I think the rule should be "PUP passes if we have at least one +1 and no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170612/3e8e6f41/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list