[Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request)

[Mihai Ibanescu]

Bernhard,

It may have been clear for others, but I need to clarify this for myself.

Is the intention of the patch to allow pulp to run on a SuSE system?

Or is it to make Pulp repositories that are properly understood by zypper?

The title of the PR seems to imply the latter, while the patch seems to
implement the former.

Thank you!
Mihai


On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Bernhard Suttner <suttner at atix.de> wrote:

> .... just spend some minutes and fixed the issues found by flake8. See
> pull request: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1041
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Von: *"Bernhard Suttner" <suttner at atix.de>
> *An: *Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> *Gesendet: *Sonntag, 26. März 2017 16:29:13
> *Betreff: *[Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have send a pull request to pulp_rpm regarding using zypper instead of
> yum on SUSE based distributions. I know, that some (OK, a lot) of tests
> failed.
>
> Would you merge this change if I would fix the issue? Just want to make
> sure, if there is anything else I should consider. Maybe there are other
> integrations planned like dnf and you want to re-structure the code in this
> part - e.g. with a configurable plugin structure.
>
> Best regards,
> Bernhard
>
> ATIX Informationstechnologie und Consulting AG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170327/9dacee24/attachment.htm>