[Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request)

[Mihai Ibanescu]

Thanks for clarifying, I hadn't noticed the "handlers" portion of the path.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Bernhard Suttner <suttner at atix.de> wrote:

> Hi Mihai,
>
> the change is on the client side to use zypper instead of yum to install /
> uninstall / update packages and package groups. Zypper is the package
> manager on SUSE based linux distribution (pretty good as it is written in
> C++ and therefore really fast)
>
> I guess, you are also planning to integrate dnf and use it instead of yum.
> Therefore, I think you will need to have a plugin structure to decide,
> which package manager to use on the various systems.
>
> Best regards,
> Bernhard
>
> ------------------------------
> *Von: *"Mihai Ibanescu" <mihai.ibanescu at gmail.com>
> *An: *"suttner" <suttner at atix.de>
> *CC: *"Pulp-dev" <Pulp-dev at redhat.com>
> *Gesendet: *Montag, 27. März 2017 14:56:00
> *Betreff: *Re: [Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request)
>
> Bernhard,
> It may have been clear for others, but I need to clarify this for myself.
>
> Is the intention of the patch to allow pulp to run on a SuSE system?
>
> Or is it to make Pulp repositories that are properly understood by zypper?
>
> The title of the PR seems to imply the latter, while the patch seems to
> implement the former.
>
> Thank you!
> Mihai
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Bernhard Suttner <suttner at atix.de> wrote:
>
>> .... just spend some minutes and fixed the issues found by flake8. See
>> pull request: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1041
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *Von: *"Bernhard Suttner" <suttner at atix.de>
>> *An: *Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> *Gesendet: *Sonntag, 26. März 2017 16:29:13
>> *Betreff: *[Pulp-dev] Use zypper on SUSE instead of yum (pull request)
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have send a pull request to pulp_rpm regarding using zypper instead of
>> yum on SUSE based distributions. I know, that some (OK, a lot) of tests
>> failed.
>>
>> Would you merge this change if I would fix the issue? Just want to make
>> sure, if there is anything else I should consider. Maybe there are other
>> integrations planned like dnf and you want to re-structure the code in this
>> part - e.g. with a configurable plugin structure.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bernhard
>>
>> ATIX Informationstechnologie und Consulting AG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170327/fbdde5ad/attachment.htm>