[Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

[Milan Kovacik]

Hey David,

thanks, +1

--
milan

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. Reviews/feedback
> are welcome:
>
> https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11
>
> I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting
> model from PUP-1:
>
> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted."
> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable."
> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable."
> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and
> addressed."
>
> Deadline will be July 22, 2018.
>
> David
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are accepted[0],
>> we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are accepted. I’d
>> like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process for revising
>> accepted PUPs.
>>
>> I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”) that
>> says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new PUP.
>> This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against the PUP
>> with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote decided by our
>> existing lazy consensus model.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision
>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md
>>
>> David
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180709/15426209/attachment.htm>