[Pulp-dev] Dev freeze

[Dana Walker]

That sounds good to me, and consistent with the wikipedia definition of a
feature freeze. [0]


[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeze_(software_engineering)


--Dana

Dana Walker

Associate Software Engineer

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com>
<https://red.ht/sig>

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:58 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> I was looking at the release schedule page[0] and I saw that we define
> release terms like ‘beta’ and ‘release candidate’ but we don’t define what
> a ‘dev freeze’ means. I’d like to add the definition of ‘dev freeze' to our
> release schedule page since it sounds like there has been some confusion
> around what a ‘dev freeze’ is exactly.
>
> The beta (as it’s currently defined on the release schedule page) is a
> freeze of all features or bugs except for regressions related to the
> release. Personally, I think a dev freeze should defined as a freeze of
> feature (or story) work but bug fixes are permitted.
>
> Thoughts? I’ll leave this discussion open until next week and then update
> the page unless anyone objects.
>
> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Release_Schedule
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20181105/ec1a513b/attachment.htm>