[Pulp-dev] Dev freeze
dalley at redhat.com
Mon Nov 5 20:51:26 UTC 2018
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:
> That sounds good to me, and consistent with the wikipedia definition of a
> feature freeze. 
>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeze_(software_engineering)
> Dana Walker
> Associate Software Engineer
> Red Hat
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:58 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I was looking at the release schedule page and I saw that we define
>> release terms like ‘beta’ and ‘release candidate’ but we don’t define what
>> a ‘dev freeze’ means. I’d like to add the definition of ‘dev freeze' to our
>> release schedule page since it sounds like there has been some confusion
>> around what a ‘dev freeze’ is exactly.
>> The beta (as it’s currently defined on the release schedule page) is a
>> freeze of all features or bugs except for regressions related to the
>> release. Personally, I think a dev freeze should defined as a freeze of
>> feature (or story) work but bug fixes are permitted.
>> Thoughts? I’ll leave this discussion open until next week and then update
>> the page unless anyone objects.
>>  https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Release_Schedule
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev