[Pulp-dev] Moving pulp_gem

[Ina Panova]

Yay!


--------
Regards,

Ina Panova
Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."


On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:52 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> FYI, pulp_gem has been moved to the Pulp org. I feel like we should maybe
> clarify in the future which plugins belong under the Pulp org but the
> general consensus among Pulp members is we should move it and I didn't want
> to hold back transferring pulp_gem.
>
> David
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:27 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Can I ask the motivation for moving pulp_gem to the pulp org? I was
>> actually thinking we should maybe consider moving plugins out of the Pulp
>> org to alleviate the stress on resources such as Travis.
>>
>> If we decide to move pulp_gem into the Pulp org, I'll be happy to do the
>> leg work.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:39 AM Matthias Dellweg <dellweg at atix.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to suggest to move the pulp_gem plugin to the pulp
>>> namespace on GH.
>>> What do you all think?
>>>
>>> Who should i ask for help to perform the transfer?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200213/df782576/attachment.htm>