[Pulp-dev] Moving pulp_gem
ipanova at redhat.com
Thu Feb 13 17:31:10 UTC 2020
Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
"Do not go where the path may lead,
go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:52 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
> FYI, pulp_gem has been moved to the Pulp org. I feel like we should maybe
> clarify in the future which plugins belong under the Pulp org but the
> general consensus among Pulp members is we should move it and I didn't want
> to hold back transferring pulp_gem.
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:27 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> Can I ask the motivation for moving pulp_gem to the pulp org? I was
>> actually thinking we should maybe consider moving plugins out of the Pulp
>> org to alleviate the stress on resources such as Travis.
>> If we decide to move pulp_gem into the Pulp org, I'll be happy to do the
>> leg work.
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:39 AM Matthias Dellweg <dellweg at atix.de>
>>> I would like to suggest to move the pulp_gem plugin to the pulp
>>> namespace on GH.
>>> What do you all think?
>>> Who should i ask for help to perform the transfer?
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev